![]() ![]() I know both aren't anything to write to write home about out of the box accuracy wise. Im looking for an accuracy comparison of an out of a box m9/92 fs to a Springfield Armory Milspec. Im looking for comments/concers on the beretta. The one and only cmp match I have shot so far, I scored a guys target that shot like a 270 and he used a stock milspec with the low profile combat sight. I'd rather shoot the match for "history/nostalgia" sake along with for fun sake. That, mixed with probably never being good enough to do well in a cmp match, i figured a stock gun would be fine.for its price. ![]() From what I thought i have heard, you can only shoot 4 cmp matches a year. I am aware that there are minimal m9/92fs bullseye gunsmiths out there, the price of upgradeing them are way more ecpensive, and 1911 is the way to go, which I have several already (none that are cmp legal). For the price of a decent used one or a new on online, It appears to be a better price deal than a mil spec 1911. I dont have one of those yet, and I do have a brick of 9mm thats been sitting in the safe for 3 years. While at Cabelas I saw the 92fs and thought. However, I finally found out that it is a series 80 style, and didn't want to get it out of principle. Due to the some what scarcity of milspecs in the area and their rising prices, I had been eyeing the auto ordnance wwII version. I had been considering a mil spec bare bones Springfield for EIC matches. I have gone almost 3 month without buying a new firearm, and I had been doing well until today when I went to the local Cabelas and got to thinking. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |